Today we filed the Reply in the Bumpstock case regarding our Motion for Preliminary Injunction

You can read the filing here. What we demonstrated is that the governments' position that a bumpstock is a machinegun is arbitrary, capricious and unsupported in the law. An analogy was made that if a bumpstock is a machinegun, then a manual transmission must be an automatic transmission using the same logic presented to us by the government defendants.

The Court (in DC) set this for a hearing on February 19, 2019 at 3PM.

Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Search By Tags
No tags yet.
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square