Yesterday, we filed the response and opposition to New York's Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment

On September 9, 2018, New York filed it's response to the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and filed its own Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment in the Taser/Stun Gun case in the Northern District of New York. You can read it here. The memorandum begins on page 347. Essentially, New York's position is that you have no right to a Taser or a Stun Gun and you have an "adequate alternative" in a handgun, rifle, shotgun or severely watered-down pepper spray.

We filed Plaintiff's Opposition to NY's Cross-Motion and Reply to their opposition of Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. You can read it here. The memorandum begins on page 26.

Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Search By Tags
No tags yet.
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square



​​​​​This website has been prepared by Stamboulieh Law​, PLLC for informational purposes only. The information contained herein is not legal advice, and recipients of content from this site, clients or otherwise, should not rely on the information contained herein without seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice. Viewing this site or communicating with a Stamboulieh Law, PLLC attorney via e-mail, through this site or otherwise, does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between Stamboulieh Law, PLLC and any person or entity. Confidential information should not be sent to the firm without the prior approval of the firm, and the content of any correspondence sent via the Internet will not be considered or maintained as confidential unless such approval is obtained.​


​​​​© 2019 by Stamboulieh Law, PLLC.