New York Attorney General files response in Taser case, and no, it's not a joke.

I guess before I argue these motions on March 24, 2017, I have to figure out if the Supreme Court's Heller opinion is binding law in New York. That sounds like a strange question, but if you've ever read Heller, then you would know that most of what is written in the New York Attorney General's response completely contradicts Heller.

It amazes me that after three fairly clear and recent Supreme Court cases, we can be fighting over something innocuous as a Taser or stun gun and whether that type of weapon is covered by the Second Amendment. I invite you to read New York's memorandum to see how far the state will go to deny citizens their constitutional right to keep and bear arms.

You can read New York's memorandum here.


Featured Posts
Recent Posts
Archive
Search By Tags
No tags yet.
Follow Us
  • Facebook Basic Square
  • Twitter Basic Square
  • Google+ Basic Square

FREE BACKGROUND INFORMATION AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST

 

​​​​​This website has been prepared by Stamboulieh Law​, PLLC for informational purposes only. The information contained herein is not legal advice, and recipients of content from this site, clients or otherwise, should not rely on the information contained herein without seeking appropriate legal or other professional advice. Viewing this site or communicating with a Stamboulieh Law, PLLC attorney via e-mail, through this site or otherwise, does not constitute or create an attorney-client relationship between Stamboulieh Law, PLLC and any person or entity. Confidential information should not be sent to the firm without the prior approval of the firm, and the content of any correspondence sent via the Internet will not be considered or maintained as confidential unless such approval is obtained.​

 

​​​​© 2019 by Stamboulieh Law, PLLC.