New Orleans Municipal Code § 54-1 defines a stun gun or a Taser as a destructive device. “The term ‘destructive devi...
Today we filed a Taser challenge against the City of New Orleans
November 17, 2016
Today, New Jersey filed this letter with the Court, requesting that "... the Court schedule an in-person conference in the hopes of resolving this cas...
New Jersey requests "in-person" settlement conference in Taser case
November 16, 2016
Today, we received the following production in the NFATCA FOIA filed on behalf of Mr. Savage. For ease of reviewing, we have broken it into two separ...
ATF Delivers Documents in NFATCA FOIA Case
November 22, 2016
Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed in NJ Taser Case
November 14, 2016
After New Jersey's concession in Lambert, and then answer in NJ2AS/Mark Cheeseman's case, we drafted and filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, which essentially asks the Court to enter judgment in our favor because we are entitled to it. Here is a snippet:
Between requesting extensions and answering the Complaint on November 10, 2016, Defendant Christopher Porrino, in a case styled State of New Jersey v. Kevin Lambert, Docket No. A-1996-15T5 (attached), conceded that the State of New Jersey’s “… stun-gun statute violates the Second Amendment…” Id. at 10. Further, the Attorney General’s concluded that “For all the foregoing reasons, this Court should rule that defendant’s conviction for possession of a stun-gun violates the Second Amendment…” Id. at 16. This concession came three days before the Defendants in the instant case filed their Answer; essentially denying that the stun gun ban violates the Second Amendment.